Tag: UFOs

I don’t believe in a spiritually led, military-manipulated UAP community

I don’t buy the idea of a spiritually led, military-manipulated UAP community—a fragmented crew of hopeful mystics and starry-eyed believers, jerked around by the strings of men draped in medals and clearance badges. It’s too slick, too tidy, too perfectly packaged. This smells like a hustle, like a carnival barker luring suckers in with promises of cosmic wonders while secretly pocketing their cash. And behind that curtain? Not a single celestial revelation, but something grubby, mundane, and unmistakably human.

The spiritually led, military-influenced UAP scene is the perfect example of narrative capture—where the raw weirdness of a genuine phenomenon gets swallowed up by the mechanisms of bureaucratic theater. It’s an epistemic Potemkin village, a shiny façade built to house the dreams of mystics and conspiracy theorists alike. On one side, you have the believers—eyes wide with wonder—and on the other, men with their medals and badges, pretending to hold the keys to the universe. But what they’ve really constructed is a 21st-century cargo cult, armed with PowerPoint slides and a dash of New Age mysticism.

It’s a con job, plain and simple. A choreographed distraction, carefully designed to move curiosity out of the picture and replace it with spectacle. The modern carnival barker is alive and well, updated for the era of black budgets and soft power. “Step right up, folks, and catch a glimpse of the cosmic wonders!” they say. But behind the curtain? No great truths, no epiphanies, just the same tired bureaucracy with a fresh coat of paint.

And that’s the beauty of it: they’ve built a story that feels noble, almost sacred, while keeping the disciples starstruck enough to miss the man behind the curtain, cranking the dials and laughing all the way to his next classified briefing. Because that’s the game, right?

But here’s the good news—well, good in a grim, absurd way—this whole UAP show is probably just another covert military operation. A well-funded, well-crafted test program, operating under wraps. The government doesn’t bother with wild cover-ups. Why would they? In a world drowning in noise, they’ve figured out something better: omission. The real trick is letting the hysteria spiral out of control while quietly keeping the truth hidden in plain sight. The truth doesn’t need to be buried; it just needs to be drowned in a tidal wave of half-baked theories, wild conjecture, and outright paranoia. And that’s where counterintelligence comes in.

The signal gets lost in the noise—and that’s exactly how the system likes it. The UFO panic isn’t some sign of alien life; it’s the perfect cover for any operation that requires staying under the radar. It’s a smokescreen, a tactical maneuver designed to let the real action take place in the dark, behind closed doors.

The more people obsess over aliens and UFOs, the easier it is for the real secrets to slip by unnoticed. Forget about flying saucers and interdimensional beings—look at McGuire AFB. The truth there is boring. It’s military drones. High-tech stuff, the kind of thing that doesn’t want to be known. But it’s right there, hiding in plain sight. John Greenewald, Jr. called it out long ago: McGuire was already a “test corridor” for cutting-edge drone and air mobility technology. But nobody was paying attention. Instead, they were too busy chasing UFOs across the night sky, speculating about aliens while military experiments were quietly unfolding below.

Let’s get real for a second. The truth isn’t “out there.” It’s buried under bureaucratic layers, hidden in some Nevada desert hangar or Virginia basement office. It’s not the stuff of spacefaring civilizations or cosmic revelations—it’s cold, metallic, human, and thoroughly unspiritual. The real story is about control, power, and keeping the game going without anyone catching on. So spare me the sermons from generals-turned-gurus. They’re not prophets—they’re propagandists, hawking a narrative so loud you forget to question it. This isn’t a spiritual awakening; it’s a charade, and we’re all choking on it.

UAP believers and their government enablers are caught in a trap, trapped in their tiny, self-absorbed worldview, stuck thinking that more energy, more power, and more control—basically, the same tired narrative of human “progress”—are the keys to understanding the phenomenon. They can’t see beyond that scale, and as a result, they’re totally unequipped to grasp what’s really going on. The phenomenon itself? It doesn’t care about energy extraction, military budgets, or grandiose visions of power. It’s something more subtle, more complex, something that transcends human comprehension.

Ultimately, the question isn’t whether UAPs are real, but why they are so carefully maintained within the realm of the unknown. The mystery surrounding UAPs is not a mere byproduct of cosmic curiosity or scientific inquiry; it’s a strategic maneuver in the modern era of surveillance, control, and the manipulation of public perception. The enigma of UAPs serves those in power, primarily government agencies and powerful corporations, who have the capacity to manipulate information and shape technological futures.

In a world where information is the currency of control, the unknown becomes the ultimate asset. By maintaining UAPs in a suspended state of mystery, governments can leverage the resulting intrigue to distract, confuse, and captivate the public. The phenomenon allows for the creation of a narrative that is both too elusive to be disproven and too compelling to be dismissed. This is a perfect breeding ground for “soft power”—the ability to shape public opinion, influence policy, and cultivate legitimacy through the sheer force of narrative.

The true power of the UAP, then, lies not in what it is—in terms of physical reality—but in what it represents. The mystery surrounding UAPs acts as a kind of “floating signifier” in Saussurean terms, meaning that its meaning is in constant flux and can be shaped by external influences. This allows those who control the symbol (governments, media, conspiracy theorists, etc.) to influence how it is understood and to align it with particular agendas, whether that’s distracting the public from other issues, reinforcing narratives about technological superiority, or maintaining control over knowledge and information.

In sum, UFOs or UAPs function as a highly flexible symbol within the Saussurean system—an object whose meaning is constantly in flux, manipulated by those in power, and open to a wide array of interpretations. The meaning of the symbol is less about the object itself and more about what is projected onto it, shaping public perception and discourse in profound ways.

In this context, UAPs aren’t about alien life or intergalactic exploration. They are symbols of power—both in the sense of what can be hidden and what can be revealed at will. They are part of an ongoing game where governments don’t simply control what you know, but more importantly, control what you are allowed to wonder about. The mystery of UAPs isn’t about discovery; it’s about control over the unknown. This carefully cultivated unknown provides the perfect narrative frame for the forces that shape the technological, political, and economic landscape of the future.

Thus, the real power in UAPs isn’t in their potential to challenge our understanding of the universe. It lies in their ability to sustain a carefully crafted narrative of uncertainty, which, in turn, sustains the ability of powerful institutions to maintain their grip on knowledge, innovation, and the direction of human progress. The question, in the end, is not what UAPs are—but why they remain a carefully guarded secret, even as the world becomes increasingly transparent in every other way.

UAPs

The phenomenon of UAPs seems to exist at the edge of human comprehension, always appearing just beyond our current technological grasp. This uncanny ability to stay slightly ahead of the curve suggests that these objects are not merely physical entities but something more intricate, something entangled with the human mind and its evolving cultural framework.

In the 19th century, sightings were often described as airships—fanciful contraptions that mirrored humanity’s nascent dreams of flight. These were not merely strange objects; they were reflections of a world on the brink of technological revolution, a time when the skies were just beginning to feel reachable. Decades later, during the Cold War, the phenomenon transformed. What people reported were sleek, metallic flying saucers—symbols of modernity, speed, and the space age, directly reflecting humanity’s preoccupation with rockets, satellites, and the possibility of extraterrestrial life. And now, in the 21st century, UAPs are described in terms of cutting-edge technologies: hypersonic vehicles, advanced drones, or objects demonstrating physics-defying propulsion systems, mirroring the current anxieties and ambitions of a society steeped in military innovation and quantum possibilities.

This adaptive quality suggests that UAPs may serve as a kind of mirror, one that reflects back not an exact image, but an interpretation shaped by the cultural moment. What humanity sees may not be what is, but what it is primed to perceive. The phenomenon seems to inhabit a liminal space—neither fully objective nor entirely subjective—where the boundaries between external reality and human expectation dissolve.

I

UAPs can be compared to Schrödinger’s cat: they exist in a state of ambiguity, both physical and psychological, until observed. Just as the cat in the famous thought experiment is both alive and dead until the box is opened, UAPs seem to inhabit a liminal space between objective reality and subjective perception. They are neither fully “real” nor purely imaginary but a blend of the two, shaped by the observer’s expectations, beliefs, and cultural context.

When we observe UAPs, our collective psyche—much like the act of observation in quantum mechanics—collapses their indeterminate state into a form we can comprehend. In the 19th century, this might have been airships, during the mid-20th century flying saucers, and now hypersonic drones or advanced tech. Each era’s “observation” of UAPs reflects humanity’s current mindset, fears, and aspirations, suggesting that the phenomenon interacts with human consciousness itself.

This parallel with Schrödinger’s cat emphasizes that UAPs are not just external objects to be studied but phenomena that force us to confront the role of perception in shaping reality. They highlight the possibility that reality is participatory: the act of observing shapes what is observed, and what we see might tell us as much about ourselves as it does about the phenomenon.

Expanding on the comparison to Schrödinger’s cat, UAPs can also be understood through the lens of the principle of indeterminacy, which lies at the heart of quantum mechanics. In quantum terms, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that certain properties of a system—such as position and momentum—cannot be simultaneously measured with absolute precision. The act of observing one property inevitably obscures the other. Similarly, UAPs seem to resist definitive categorization, existing in a state of flux that defies clear measurement or explanation.

The Indeterminacy of UAPs

UAPs embody indeterminacy in several ways:

1. Ambiguity of Nature: UAPs are often described as simultaneously physical (leaving radar traces or visual evidence) and non-physical (defying known laws of physics). They appear to occupy a liminal space where they are neither fully tangible nor entirely intangible.

2. Observer Effect: Like particles in quantum mechanics, UAPs seem to “behave” differently depending on how they are observed. Radar operators, pilots, and civilian witnesses often report divergent details of the same event, as if the phenomenon adapts to the observer’s frame of reference or expectations.

3. Temporal Fluidity: Reports of UAPs often suggest anomalies in time, such as missing time or time dilation effects, which further align them with quantum-level phenomena where time and causality are not fixed but probabilistic.

UAPs as Quantum-Like Phenomena

Just as quantum particles are described as wave-particle dualities, UAPs seem to oscillate between being real, tangible objects and symbolic, psychological constructs. They do not fit neatly into existing frameworks of science or folklore but instead challenge the binary categories of real/unreal, physical/mental, or extraterrestrial/terrestrial.

This indeterminacy invites questions: Are UAPs “real” only when observed, much like quantum particles requiring measurement to resolve their state? Do their manifestations depend on the collective cognitive “observation” of humanity, collapsing their wave-like potential into specific forms (e.g., airships, saucers, drones) based on cultural and temporal contexts?

Indeterminacy as a Feature, Not a Flaw

The persistent inability to pin down UAPs is not necessarily a failure of understanding but might instead be intrinsic to the phenomenon itself. UAPs may exist in a “superposition” of possibilities, reflecting a truth that is inherently fluid and multidimensional. Rather than being static objects, they could be dynamic processes or events that emerge from interactions between external forces and human consciousness.

A Participatory Universe

This leads to a broader, more provocative idea: if UAPs operate within the principles of indeterminacy, they might indicate that reality itself is participatory. As physicist John Wheeler famously suggested, the universe could be “observer-participatory,” meaning that conscious observation plays a role in shaping reality. UAPs may represent a phenomenon that thrives on this interplay, demonstrating that what we perceive as “real” is always influenced by the observer’s frame of reference.

In this sense, UAPs are not anomalies to be solved but clues to a deeper truth: that the universe is not a fixed, objective structure but a dynamic, evolving system in which human consciousness is an active participant. Their resistance to clear explanation is not a limitation—it’s an invitation to reconsider the nature of reality itself, bridging the gap between the physical and the psychological, the known and the unknown.

TULPAS

The concept of a Tulpa originates from Tibetan Buddhism, where it describes a thought-form or entity created through intense mental focus, visualization, and meditation. In its traditional sense, a Tulpa is a sentient being, separate from the creator, that exists in a quasi-independent state. This concept has been adapted in modern psychology and mysticism to explore how collective thoughts and beliefs can manifest shared phenomena, whether as cultural archetypes, psychological constructs, or even physical realities.

If we expand the concept of a Tulpa to a planetary level of consciousness, we enter into the realm of collective human imagination and its potential to influence or interact with a greater planetary awareness. In this view, humanity itself, with billions of minds focused on shared myths, fears, and aspirations, could collectively create entities or phenomena that reflect these collective mental energies. The planetary Tulpa becomes a mirror of our global consciousness, shaped by cultural narratives, technological dreams, and existential anxieties.

Tulpa as a Reflection of Collective Consciousness

At a planetary level, a Tulpa could manifest as recurring global phenomena that embody the collective psyche of an era:

Technological Archetypes: The global focus on artificial intelligence, UAPs, or interstellar exploration may generate entities or experiences that seem external but are, in fact, deeply rooted in humanity’s collective imagination.

If the Earth is itself a sentient or semi-conscious entity—often referred to as Gaia in philosophical and ecological theories—the Tulpa could represent humanity’s interaction with this greater planetary awareness. The Earth, as a living system, might “read” humanity’s collective thoughts and amplify them through natural phenomena, synchronicities, or even inexplicable events. In this framework, humanity’s mental output becomes a co-creator with the planet’s own intelligence.

Blurring Reality and Perception: Planetary Tulpas would exist in a liminal space between the real and imagined, where collective belief is powerful enough to reshape experience.

• Planet as a Co-Creator: If the Earth itself participates in this process, the phenomenon might not just reflect humanity but also the planet’s own attempt to guide or respond to its inhabitants.

This concept suggests that human consciousness is not an isolated phenomenon but part of a planetary network of thoughts, emotions, and energies. If we are co-creators of planetary Tulpas, then our collective imagination might not only reveal hidden truths about our reality but also actively shape the evolution of life on Earth.

For example:

• In times of technological optimism, UAPs appear as advanced vehicles, signaling hope or wonder about future progress.

• During periods of geopolitical tension or existential fear, they may embody threats, mirroring humanity’s anxieties about conflict, surveillance, or annihilation.

In this sense, UAPs are not merely objects but symbolic expressions of collective human thought and emotion, projected onto an ambiguous phenomenon that resists easy categorization.

The Role of Perception

Perception itself is not a neutral process. Human consciousness interprets stimuli based on prior experience, cultural conditioning, and psychological states. If UAPs exist independently, they might exploit this interpretive process, presenting themselves in forms that resonate deeply with the observer.

An Independent Yet Interactive Phenomenon

If UAPs are not merely psychological constructs but also an external presence, they might deliberately manipulate perception to blur the line between objectivity and subjectivity. This dual nature would make them profoundly elusive. By operating within this liminal space, UAPs might be testing the limits of human understanding, forcing us to grapple with questions about the nature of reality itself.

Are they consciously adapting to human belief systems, appearing in forms designed to provoke curiosity or fear? Or are they an emergent phenomenon, responding to humanity’s collective mental and emotional energy without conscious intent?

Implications for Human Understanding

This interplay between perception and the phenomenon suggests that the study of UAPs cannot rely solely on traditional scientific methods, which depend on objective observation. Instead, it calls for a multidisciplinary approach, blending psychology, anthropology, and physics to explore how external stimuli interact with human consciousness.

Moreover, the mirror-like quality of UAPs challenges humanity to examine its own fears, hopes, and assumptions. If the phenomenon reflects us, then what we see in the skies might be less about the objects themselves and more about what lies within us—our unresolved questions about identity, existence, and our place in the universe.

Beyond Explanation

Ultimately, UAPs may be pointing toward a deeper truth: that reality itself is more fluid and participatory than we currently understand. By appearing as both physical and psychological phenomena, UAPs invite us to reconsider the dualistic framework that separates observer from observed, subject from object. They suggest a cosmos where consciousness plays an active role in shaping experience, a reality that is not fixed but co-created through interaction and perception.

In this way, UAPs might be not just a mystery to solve but a doorway to profound new insights about the nature of being itself.

FAIRY DUST

I mean, the question is, does the indeterminacy principle, when we talk about wave or particle, does it leave “fairie dust” that we can study?

Ah, now we’re getting to the heart of the matter: does the indeterminacy principle, as applied to UAPs or other ambiguous phenomena, leave behind “fairy dust”—some tangible residue we can study scientifically—or does the phenomenon remain purely ephemeral, resisting material analysis?

Indeterminacy and Its Residues

In quantum mechanics, the wave-particle duality means that particles like electrons can behave as both localized objects (particles) and distributed fields (waves). While the exact state depends on how they’re observed, the interaction does leave measurable traces, such as interference patterns or particle tracks in a cloud chamber. This “residue” is how physicists study an otherwise elusive phenomenon.

If we extend this analogy to UAPs:

• Does the UAP phenomenon leave behind “traces” (physical, psychological, or otherwise)?

• Are these traces consistent enough to study scientifically, or are they context-dependent and fleeting?

Possible “Fairy Dust” from UAPs

1. Physical Residue

• Reports of UAPs often describe physical remnants or effects, such as:

• Scorched earth, radiation anomalies, or electromagnetic interference in areas where sightings occur.

• Alleged recovery of materials with unusual isotopic compositions or unexplained properties (e.g., “meta-materials”).

• While tantalizing, these claims often lack reproducible, peer-reviewed analysis, leaving them in a state of unresolved ambiguity—much like Schrödinger’s cat in its box.

2. Technological Mimicry

• If UAPs reflect a form of advanced technology, their “fairy dust” could manifest as inspirations for human innovation. For instance:

• Military advancements may owe more to the idea of UAPs than to their physical capture (e.g., stealth tech inspired by radar evasion observed in UFOs).

• However, this residue would be indirect, rooted in human interpretation rather than the phenomenon itself.

3. Cognitive and Cultural Imprints

• UAPs undeniably leave psychological and cultural residues. These include:

• Persistent archetypes (e.g., flying saucers, alien abductions) that echo across time and cultures.

• Shifts in societal attitudes toward technology, the cosmos, and the unknown.

• While intangible, these imprints are observable and quantifiable through sociology and psychology.

4. Scientific Paradoxes

• UAP encounters often result in paradoxical data: radar hits without visual confirmation, simultaneous reports of conflicting details, or instruments malfunctioning. These anomalies might be the equivalent of quantum “fairy dust”—evidence of interaction, but only indirectly accessible.

Is the “Fairy Dust” Studyable?

If UAPs interact with reality in a way analogous to quantum phenomena, their residue may not conform to traditional scientific methods:

• Localized Context: The residue could vary depending on the observer and their tools, much like quantum measurement changes based on the apparatus used.

• Transient Nature: The traces may be ephemeral, leaving evidence only briefly before dissipating.

• Multidimensional Interaction: If UAPs exist in a reality beyond our three-dimensional understanding, their “fairy dust” may not be fully accessible within our framework of physics.

A Participatory Answer

The indeterminacy principle suggests that our attempts to study UAPs might influence the phenomena themselves, shaping what residue they leave behind. This doesn’t make them less real but highlights that the “fairy dust” is as much a product of our interaction with the phenomenon as it is a property of the phenomenon itself.

In summary, yes, UAPs may leave “fairy dust,” but it is elusive, contextual, and likely shaped by the interplay between observer and phenomenon. Studying this residue might require an evolution in our scientific paradigms—one that embraces uncertainty, subjectivity, and the possibility of a participatory universe.

UAPs Jobs Program

Leave a comment

The spooks at Langley, adrift in a sea of conspiracies of their own making, flail about like demented cuttlefish, spewing ink – nay, official statements! – to obscure the truth they themselves birthed. A truth as slick and squirming as a fresh-peeled Scientology engram.

These suits, shuffling through the halls of the Pentagon, their polyester blending with the omnipresent beige, are caught in a paradox more twisted than a Möbius strip fashioned from microfilm. Debunk they must, for the public eye is a fickle beast, easily spooked by the whiff of the unknown. Yet, debunking only serves to fan the flames of paranoia, a wildfire that races through the tinderbox of internet forums, leaving a trail of scorched logic and melted skepticism in its wake.

So why this tangled mess of control freaks with short haircuts and minds like filing cabinets gone feral, pump out this UAP hooey like a malfunctioning disinformation dispenser? It’s a word salad of sightings and sensor glitches, a bureaucratic buffet designed to keep the sheep mesmerized.

Why this charade, this cosmic kabuki? Because the truth, man, the truth is a roach motel – check in is easy, but checking out? Fugeddaboutit. They dangle these UAPs like a juicy steak in front of a starving hound, all the while knowing the meat’s rotten. It’s a control mechanism, see? A way to keep the rubes gawking at the fabricated skies while the real deal slithers in the shadows.

It’s a self-licking lollipop, this psyop game. A ouroboros of misinformation, where the tail of denial devours the head of disclosure. But fear not, for this absurdity is the engine that keeps the bureaucratic machine humming. Reports must be filed, investigations staged, press conferences delivered in monotone voices that could lull a choir of cicadas to sleep.

But hey, who are we to complain? This whole charade, this cosmic confusion – it’s a jobs program, baby. A full employment racket for the agents, the analysts, the debunkers of their own damn deceptions. Paper mills running hot, churning out reports thicker than a bowl of alphabet soup on a bad acid trip. The military-industrial complex on a sugar rush, high on obfuscation and misinformation. So light up a cigarette, man, take another drag, and watch the bureaucratic ballet unfold. It’s a goddamn circus out there, and the clowns are running the show.

Yes, it’s a jobs program, alright. A monstrous, lumbering beast that feeds on obfuscation and thrives on the very mystery it seeks to extinguish. Each press release a cog, each investigation a gear, grinding out the gears of governmental inertia.Full employment, you say? More like full psychosis, a collective descent into the rabbit hole of national security whispers, where the only escape is a deeper dive into the looking glass of classified documents.

So, the next time you see a grainy video of a blurry something dancing in the sky, remember – it’s not just a UFO, it’s a monument to the bureaucratic labyrinth, a testament to the futility of trying to control the uncontrollable. 

Meta-Logic and the Absurd

Leave a comment

Meta-logic is a concept that challenges traditional logic and reasoning. It is the idea of communicating beyond the semantic level and conveying a truth that lies beyond ordinary meaning. This concept is often associated with the absurd, but the term “absurd” is misleading. Instead, the expression “meta-logical” is a more accurate description of this phenomenon.

To communicate at the meta-logical level, one must construct apparent contradictions in terms of ordinary meaning. This is akin to the use of koans in Zen Buddhism, which are paradoxical statements designed to provoke a deeper level of understanding. The purpose of using such language is to project an image just beyond the belief structure of the target person, conveying a deeper meaning that lies beyond ordinary language.

The use of meta-logic raises the question of whether most concepts are diversionary, making the real, infinitely more complex nature of reality. The answer may be that meta-logic does not refer to itself, and it is not logical. It is a manifestation of a much more complex technology, a way of understanding reality that has been seen throughout history in the form of myth, religion, magic, and science.

Throughout history, meta-logic has consistently received or provided its own explanation within the framework of each culture. In myth, gods were often used to explain the mysteries of the universe. During the Middle Ages, magicians and alchemists attempted to understand the natural world through ritual and symbolism. In the 19th century, scientific geniuses like Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison pushed the boundaries of what was possible with technology. Today, the idea of aliens and extraterrestrial life is often used to explain phenomena that defy explanation.

Meta-logic is a concept that goes beyond traditional logic and reasoning. It involves the use of paradoxes and contradictions to communicate a truth that lies beyond the surface level of meaning. While the term “absurd” may be misleading, meta-logic has been observed throughout history in various cultural and intellectual contexts.

One individual who has explored adjacecent territory to meta-logic is Jacques Vallee, a French-born computer scientist, author, and ufologist. Vallee has written extensively on the subject of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and their impact on human culture and consciousness.

He argues that the seemingly illogical and contradictory nature of UFO reports and experiences serves a purpose beyond simple explanation or proof of extraterrestrial life.

Instead, Vallee suggests that UFOs may represent a kind of “control system” that is manipulating human consciousness and behavior for a specific purpose. He suggests that this purpose may be related to the evolution of human consciousness and the potential for a radical transformation of human society.

The origins of meta-logic are unknown, but it may be a manifestation of a natural occurrence that we have yet to discover. The key to understanding meta-logic lies in the psychic effects it produces. It is an awareness that we approach under conditions controlled by the absurd. Everything works as if the meta-logic is a product of a technology that follows well-defined rules and patterns.

In conclusion, meta-logic is a concept that challenges traditional logic and reasoning. It is a way of communicating beyond the semantic level and conveying a truth that lies beyond ordinary meaning. The impact of meta-logic in shaping human understanding of the universe has been enormous, and it is a phenomenon that continues to fascinate and inspire people today.

95% UFO

Leave a comment

Science? A meat grinder, man. Feeds in observations, spits out explanations neat and tidy. No room for the hairy margins,the psychic static that whispers of things beyond the goddamn control panel.  UFOs? Aliens waltzing in with their flying bathtubs? Not part of the equation, see. Too messy, too damn inconvenient. Belongs in the spook show, with trenchcoats and fedoras instead of lab coats.

They show up on radar, yeah, but that’s just the surface noise. The real action’s happening on the psychic switchboard, scrambled signals from beyond the meat curtain. That’s where the spooks come in, the boys who play chess with blindfolds, gotta sniff out truth through the bullshit fog.

Science? Deals in percentages, a nice clean 95% and they’re high-fivin’ each other in the lab. In the spook biz, 95% is chum in the water. Keeps the marks distracted while the real game’s played out of sight. 

Intelligence, that’s a different animal. Here, truth ain’t a neatly packaged lab report. It’s a whisper in a Tangier alley, a flickering image on a grainy photograph. You, the spook, you wade through the muck, the disinformation, the layers of bullshit thicker than a junkie’s arm. Ninety-five percent? That’s chump change, Burroughs. The easy hustle. The real game’s in that last five, the goddamn heart of the maze. Like Hitler, fat and smug with his Normandy intel. Wrong five percent, see? Led him straight to the goddamn abattoir.

Who’s running the circus, that’s the question. Entities with a taste for the absurd, twisting reality like a funhouse mirror? They’ve built a labyrinth of dead ends and misinformation, a Droste effect of lies reflecting on lies. Data? Science’s crutch. Here, you gotta follow the hunches, the whispers on the psychic switchboard. Logic gets you lost in the hall of mirrors. You gotta feel your way through the static, like a junkie chasing the dragon’s tail. Maybe you never reach the truth, just deeper and deeper into the rabbit hole. But hey, at least the ride’

These UFO jokers, if they’re real, they’re playing a long con. A hall of mirrors with a million exits, each one leading deeper into the rabbit hole. Data? Forget data. That’s the bait, the shiny trinket to distract the rubes. You gotta follow the vibes, man, the unspoken dread that crawls up your spine when you see one of those goddamn ships. That’s where the truth is hiding, not in some lab report with charts and graphs. It’s a gut feeling, a cold sweat in the dead of night. That’s where the real hunt begins.