Is real communication, absurd? Maybe, but the word absurd is misleading. I prefer the expression “meta-logical.” If you strive to convey a truth that lies beyond the semantic level, you must construct apparent contradictions in terms of ordinary meaning (think of koans)

— Bravo Johnson (@BravoJohnson5) March 12, 2020

A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one’s own opinion.

<>

In other words, it would have to project an image just beyond the belief structure of the target person. Aren’t most of concepts diversionary, making the real, infinitely more complex nature of reality?The thing is what I’m calling meta-logical it does not refer to itself and it’s not logical.1Bravo This meta logic has been seen throughout history and have consistently received or provided this own explanation within the framework of each culture. In myth gods, during the middle age, magicians and alchemists, during 19th century scientific geniuses and this days aliens1Meta-logic could be a manifestation of a much more complex technology. Where does it come from? Maybe it comes from a place in time.The key to understanding meta-logic/the absurd lies in the psychic effects it produces(as awareness)1Bravo We approach the absurd under conditions controlled by the absurd. Everything works as if the meta-logic is a product of a technology that follows well defined rules and patterns. We maybe dealing with an undiscovered natural occurrence but the impact in shaping man is enormous