Category: Euclidean Politics

Jesus Figures and the Marriage of High Testosterone + Neurodivergent

The relentless search for contemporary “Jesus figures” to deliver us from the oppressive grip of “the man” reveals a profound discontent with the existing ideological structure, one that is emblematic of our late capitalist condition. This can be interpreted as the collective’s desperate attempt to fill the void of the objet petit a—the unattainable object of desire, that which is always missing. This figure is expected to embody the lost cause, the pure subject who, untainted by the symbolic order, can somehow lead us to redemption.

But why the specific allure of high testosterone combined with neurodivergence? Here, we encounter a fascinating inversion reminiscent of Nietzsche’s “slave morality,” but with a distinctly postmodern twist. In classical slave morality, the oppressed transmute their weakness into a kind of moral superiority. Now, however, in a world where traditional masculinity and conformity to societal norms have been pathologized, the outcast—the one who refuses to conform to the master signifier of late capitalist normalcy—becomes the hero. This is not merely a Nietzschean reversal but a symptom of a deeper crisis in the symbolic order itself.

We could argue that this new archetype reflects an underlying anxiety in the collective unconscious. The traditional hero—rational, composed, and aligned with the symbolic law—no longer resonates in a world that feels increasingly chaotic and unmoored. Instead, we project our desire for liberation onto figures who seem to operate outside the law, who embody the raw, untamed forces that the symbolic order attempts to repress. This is the real of the neurodivergent, whose very existence is a challenge to the seamless functioning of the ideological apparatus.

Yet, this elevation of the neurodivergent, high-testosterone figure is fraught with contradictions. Is this not the ultimate fetishization of the symptom? By glorifying those who resist or are marginalized by the dominant order, we risk reinforcing the very structures we seek to escape. We are mistaking the symptom—the visible sign of our discontent—for the cure. The neurodivergent, high-testosterone savior is but another fantasy, another screen onto which we project our desire for a new master, one who can somehow deliver us from the contradictions of our existence without fundamentally altering the underlying structure.

Thus, the search for these “Jesus figures” reveals less about the potential for genuine liberation and more about our inability to confront the true nature of our discontent. We cling to the hope that someone from outside the system can save us, while refusing to acknowledge that it is the system itself that must be transformed. In this way, the marriage of high testosterone and neurodivergence becomes a new slave morality, one that allows us to critique the system while remaining safely within its bounds, never fully challenging the symbolic order that defines our reality.

Civilization’s Last Stand: Charter Networks

Leave a comment

So all the talk about civilization was just about charter cities and charter schools. They sold you a bill of goods wrapped in the shining veneer of civilization, the grand promise of order, progress, and prosperity. But what did they give you? Not the grand city on a hill, but a shantytown of grifters playing at governance, shuffling paper laws like marked cards, dealing out a stacked deck of regulations to prop up their own games. Ah, Charter Networks—the fresh guise of modern civilization’s latest masquerade. You see, it’s not just about charter cities and charter schools anymore. No, no, that was merely the opening act. Now, the spectacle has evolved into something far more insidious: Charter Networks. An elaborate tapestry woven from the threads of private enterprise and governance, designed to ensnare and extract every last drop of value from the collective body politic.

Civilization? Oh, it’s civilization alright—if you define civilization as a network of private enclaves, each one its own little fiefdom, ruled by the masters of the universe who think that the only thing keeping us from paradise is a few more well-placed rules, designed by the well-heeled and the well-fed for their own well-being.

You see, it’s all very airtight. Development is a function of laws, they say. Bad regulations stifle progress, while good rules unleash it. And who decides what’s good and what’s bad? Well, the same people who benefit from the ‘good’ rules, naturally. The same people who amassed their power and fortune under the very norms they now want to tear down in favor of new, shinier, more profitable regulations. These are the civilization people, the ones who talk big about order and development while operating under a system that’s as corrupt as a back-alley dice game.

What’s the trick? It’s simple. Persuade the rest of us to buy into the idea that we’re operating a country based on a set of corrupt norms. No small feat, considering those norms are the very ones that got these civilization folks where they are today. They want you to believe that the reason you’re not living in a utopia is because you’re clinging to the wrong rules, the old rules, the ones that just don’t work anymore. But don’t worry— they’ve got the fix. All you have to do is hand over the keys to the kingdom and trust them to rebuild the system. A new system, with new rules, designed just for you. Or rather, designed just for them, but they’ll tell you it’s for you.

It’s not about nurturing curiosity or critical thinking—it’s about creating a perfectly obedient labor force that can be easily slotted into the pre-existing hierarchical structure.

Look closely at these charter cities, these charter schools. They’re the laboratories where they test their theories, their little experiments in governance. They say it’s about efficiency, about breaking free from the constraints of a bloated, bureaucratic state. But what it’s really about is control. It’s about creating a set of laws and norms that they can manipulate to their own ends, to create a new world order where they hold all the cards and everyone else is just along for the ride.

But the pièce de résistance is the Charter Networks themselves. These sprawling conglomerates of privatized governance extend their tendrils into every facet of life. They are the new ruling class, shaping everything from local zoning laws to global trade agreements. It’s a network of interconnected power structures where the lines between private interests and public policy blur into a nightmarish miasma of corruption. They sell you the illusion of choice, while systematically dismantling the very institutions that might stand in their way.

The language is crucial here—because language, as always, is the weapon of the ruling elite. They talk about “innovation,” “efficiency,” and “disruption” as if these were sacred values, as if they weren’t just buzzwords for the systematic dismantling of democratic institutions. They wax poetic about “entrepreneurial spirit” and “market solutions,” conveniently ignoring that their so-called solutions are designed to benefit them, not you. They create a facade of dynamism while preserving a rigid and impenetrable system of privilege.

But let’s not pretend this is new. It’s the oldest trick in the book, dressed up in modern clothes. The powerful have always justified their rule by claiming to be the architects of civilization, the bearers of progress. They’ve always used the law as a tool to maintain their power, bending and twisting it to suit their needs. The difference now is that they’re doing it out in the open, with a smile on their faces and a promise of a better tomorrow. It’s all a grand illusion, a sleight of hand for the new digital age. Charter Networks are the modern equivalent of the feudal estates of yore, with their own set of rules and their own internal logic. They are the culmination of a centuries-old project to concentrate wealth and power into the hands of a few, dressed up in a shiny new coat of techno-libertarian rhetoric.

The real joke, though, is on them. Because no matter how much they try to dress it up, no matter how many charter cities and charter schools they build, they can’t escape the fundamental truth: civilization isn’t a set of laws. It’s not something you can legislate or regulate into existence. Civilization is a collective endeavor, a fragile web of relationships and shared understandings. It’s messy, chaotic, and often contradictory. But it’s real, and it’s something that can’t be engineered from the top down.

So go ahead, civilization people. Build your charter cities, rewrite your laws, play your games. But don’t be surprised when the rest of us don’t buy in. Because we see through the charade. We know that civilization isn’t about rules and regulations—it’s about people, about communities, about the messy, complicated business of living together in a shared world. And that’s something you can’t legislate, no matter how many charter cities you build.

So, as you navigate this brave new world of Charter Networks, remember one thing: you’re not witnessing a revolution. You’re witnessing a heist—a grand theft of public resources and democratic freedoms, repackaged as progress. The only thing that’s new here is the technology used to pull it off. The underlying game remains as old as the hills: the powerful consolidate, and the rest are left to scramble in the ruins.

And as for the civilization they keep touting—well, it’s a civilization for the chosen few, not for the likes of you. The Charter Networks are the final insult, the last betrayal of the very idea of a common good. So, don’t be fooled by the shiny rhetoric. Behind the glossy facade of progress and innovation lies the same old story: a rigged game where the house always wins.

The Lie Factory

The subject’s desire, a perpetual lack, constitutes a fundamental void at the heart of the psyche. This void, a gaping maw of incompleteness, seeks incessant repletion. In the political sphere, this desire manifests as a demand for an impossible fullness, a utopian ideal that can never be attained. 

In its pursuit of fulfillment, it constructs an imaginary order, a symbolic edifice where the impossible is posited as attainable. The political sphere, as a microcosm of this larger psychic drama, becomes a stage upon which this desire is projected, magnified, and ultimately frustrated.

In the political sphere, this void is projected onto the figure of the leader, a phantasmatic object destined to fill the impossible lack. The leader, in this construction, becomes a symptom of the social body, a manifestation of its collective desire, a desire predicated on a fundamental impossibility.

The leader, in this scenario, occupies a liminal space between the subject and the impossible. As the embodiment of the symbolic order, they are endowed with the power to articulate the desires of the many into a coherent narrative. Yet, this narrative, to be effective, must promise a fulfillment that is inherently unattainable. For desire is fundamentally a lack, a void that can never be completely filled.

The subject’s demand, distinct from desire, is for a concrete, attainable object. Yet, the political promise, in its essence, is a response to desire, not demand. It is a seductive illusion, a mirage in the desert of the real. The leader, then, becomes a master of the signifier, a manipulator of language who promises to satisfy the insatiable.

The leader, in this schema, becomes the object petit a, a contingent object imbued with the power to fulfill this impossible desire.

However, the leader, a symptom of the social structure, is inherently constrained by the Real. The Real, the irreducible kernel of existence, is a realm of impossibility, a traumatic limit that cannot be symbolized or mastered. Thus, the leader,as a symbolic figure, must necessarily lie. Their promises, seductive and alluring, are merely phantasmatic constructions designed to obscure the fundamental impossibility of fulfilling the subject’s desire.

In this context the leader becomes a purveyor of illusions, a master of the signifier. Their rhetoric, a carefully crafted tapestry of promises and aspirations, serves to obscure the fundamental impossibility of the desired object. The subject, in their infinite desire for completion, is seduced by this illusory promise, investing the leader with a quasi-divine status.

The sociopath, a subject profoundly alienated from the symbolic order, is particularly adept at inhabiting this liminal space between the subject’s desire and the Real’s intransigence. Lacking a stable ego, the sociopath is free to exploit the subject’s desire without the constraints of moral or ethical considerations, they are unburdened by the constraints of reality. The sociopathic leader, then, becomes a perfect embodiment of the political lie, a figure who promises the impossible while simultaneously reveling in the subject’s perpetual disillusionment.

Lacking genuine empathy, the sociopath is liberated from the constraints of the symbolic order. Their discourse is pure performance, a seamless weaving of signifiers designed to captivate the audience. The subject, in their desperate search for fulfillment, is readily seduced by this empty rhetoric.

The election of such figures is thus a testament to the fundamental disillusionment of the subject. Aware of the impossibility of their desires, the subject invests in the fantasy offered by the political lie. It is a perverse pact, a cynical arrangement wherein the subject sacrifices truth for the illusion of hope. The sociopath, in turn, exploits this vulnerability, becoming a symptom of a society that has lost touch with the real.

The question remains: can the subject be liberated from this cycle of desire and disillusionment? Can a politics based on truth and accountability emerge from the ruins of the fantasy? Or is the sociopathic leader an inevitable consequence of the subject’s fundamental alienation?

It is in this dialectic between the desiring subject and the deceitful leader that the pathology of contemporary politics is revealed. The system, predicated on the perpetual deferral of gratification, ensures the continued reproduction of power. The people, trapped in a cycle of hope and disillusionment, remain eternally complicit in their own subjugation.

The subject, in their infinite desire for completion, is complicit in this masquerade. The belief in the possibility of a perfect leader, a messianic figure who will eradicate suffering and injustice, is a testament to the subject’s refusal to accept the fundamental lack that constitutes their being. The election of sociopaths, therefore, is not merely a symptom of a failing political system but a reflection of the subject’s own desire for a master, a figure who can bear the burden of the Real and offer illusory satisfaction in its place.

influencers, podcasters, crypto scammers, and small-town tyrants

One might approach influencers, podcasters, crypto scammers, and small-town tyrants as figures who occupy different positions within the symbolic order, each representing a distinct mode of desire and the manipulation of the Other.

Influencers are the epitome of the Imaginary, where the ego is constituted through the gaze of the Other. They craft an idealized image, an objet petit a, that their followers endlessly pursue but can never fully obtain. This image functions as a mirror, reflecting not only the influencer’s own narcissism but also the desires of their audience. The influencer becomes the embodiment of the “ideal ego,” a figure who is both desired and envied, sustaining the illusion of wholeness in a fragmented symbolic landscape.

Podcasters operate within the register of the Symbolic, where discourse takes precedence over image. They engage in what Lacan would describe as the “talking cure,” but rather than facilitating the subject’s entry into the symbolic order, they often reinforce the subject’s alienation. The podcaster’s voice, a manifestation of the “big Other,” creates a pseudo-intimacy that masks the subject’s fundamental lack. Their narratives and conversations are structured around the promise of insight or enlightenment, but this is merely a lure, as the true desire lies in the endless consumption of discourse—a jouissance that traps the listener in a cycle of repetition.

Crypto scammers embody the Real in their exploitation of the symbolic order’s gaps and inconsistencies. They operate in a realm where signifiers lose their mooring, where value is untethered from any stable referent. The crypto scam is a masterstroke of the “foreclosed signifier,” a promise of wealth that exists only in the imaginary and whose inevitable collapse reveals the void at the heart of the symbolic. In this sense, the crypto scammer is a figure of radical jouissance, one who derives pleasure from the destabilization of the symbolic order itself.

Small-town tyrants represent a return to the Imaginary, but with a twist. They are figures of paternal authority, standing in for the “Name-of-the-Father,” but their power is not rooted in the symbolic law but in the arbitrary exercise of will. Their authority is a simulacrum, a hollow echo of the real paternal function, and their tyranny is a performance designed to mask their own lack. In the Lacanian sense, they are figures of “phallic jouissance,” deriving pleasure from the subjugation of others, but this pleasure is tainted by the ever-present threat of castration—the recognition of their own impotence within the broader symbolic order.

In sum, these figures—whether influencer, podcaster, crypto scammer, or small-town tyrant—are all caught in the web of desire, each embodying a different facet of Lacan’s triadic structure of the Imaginary, the Symbolic, and the Real. Their actions and personas are strategies for managing the fundamental lack that defines subjectivity, yet in doing so, they reveal the very structures they seek to escape. They are not merely players in a game of power and influence; they are symptoms of the social order’s own inherent contradictions, which they simultaneously exploit and are entrapped by.

Westphalia

You pry the jetlag from your skull like a stubborn limpet. A month in the sprawl of Westphalia, that tangled knot of history and grit, and here you are, back in the neon-drenched hyper-reality you call home. Westphalia, with its chipped chrome and flickering vid-screens, its shadows clinging to the corners like bad code – it’s a mess, sure, but a familiar mess. A place where problems simmer low, a perpetual B-movie on repeat, the heroes never quite winning, the villains never quite vanquished. A comforting mediocrity, you almost want to call it.

You step off the trans-Atlantic zeppelin, the stale recirc air a harsh contrast to the oily tang of the Westphalian sky. A month back home, a month amongst the sprawl of data spires and chromed tenements, and already a sheen of rust gathers on your memories. Back in the sprawl of Westphalia, the problems haven’t budged an inch, just another layer of grime on the ever-accumulating heap. Same old resource wars, the megacorporations like bloated ticks clinging to the carcass of the nation, the flickering vid-screens spewing the same manufactured outrage. It’s a city that runs on fumes, on a kind of inertia so ingrained it’s become a religion.  Defeat?  Here,  defeat’s a luxury they can’t afford.

A month in that museum piece of a nation-state. Same grimy politics, same simmering resentments, all draped in the threadbare cloak of “tradition.” Stuck, perpetually circling the rusted gears of history. Here, in the splintered sprawl of the Sprawl, the anxieties are at least fresh. Every datastorm brings a new existential fractal to worry over, a fresh AI memeplex twisting reality into a pretzel. Suffocating, sure, but at least the goddamn walls are still moving.

Back in Westphalia, it’s like living in a simstim of the Thirty Years’ War, low-grade conflict simmering forever beneath the surface. Here, the wars are waged in the net, in the flickering code of the matrix. At least there’s a chance, however slim, of hacking a new future. Back there, it’s just rerunning the same tired script, the ending pre-programmed. Here, the future’s a tangled mess of dark fiber and rogue AIs, but at least it’s unwritten.

Here, though, the air tastes metallic, thick with unspoken anxieties. Every newsfeed ticker scrolls with the latest existential dread, a never-ending download of potential apocalypses. Climate sirens wail like mournful data streams. AI sentience debates rage on like glitching memes. It’s enough to make your chromed synapses overload.

Here, in the neon-drenched arteries of the terminal city, the air thrums with a different kind of anxiety. Every flicker of news feeds another existential dread, a fresh wrinkle in the collective paranoia. Climate refugees clog the feeder lines,their desperation a raw nerve exposed. A.I. sentience whispers on the darknet, a specter at the feast. It’s not a city in decline, it’s a city teetering on the edge of a future it can barely comprehend. Suffocating? More like a pressure cooker,heat rising with every passing byte. 

Back in Westphalia, they muddle through, their problems as familiar as the chipped paint on their bulkheads. Here, the future rewrites itself every goddamn day, and nobody knows the ending. You pull your trenchcoat tighter, the weight of both worlds pressing down. Welcome back to the bleeding edge, cowboy.

This city, a glittering chrome labyrinth, feels claustrophobic all of a sudden. The towering arcologies cast long shadows that seem to stretch into your very soul. You reach for your smokes, the familiar hiss and burn a grounding ritual in this digital maelstrom. It’s time for a dive into the dark alleys of the net, a search for some solace in the digital underbelly. Maybe there’s a rogue AI bartender in some forgotten corner, slinging virtual whiskey and existential wisdom. Maybe there’s a niche forum for the terminally overstimulated, a place to vent your frustrations in pixelated screams.

One thing’s for sure, you can’t stay here, suffocating in the fumes of your own anxieties. This city thrives on the cutting edge, the ever-evolving chaos. Time to strap on your neuralink, jack into the noise, and find a way to carve your own path through this digital dystopia. Westphalia might muddle through, but here, at the end of history, the fight’s still on. And who knows, maybe in the cacophony of anxieties, you’ll find the spark to rewrite the ending.

Powertrip

The delusion of untainted power, chum, a roach skittering across the circuitry of the naive mind. These technologist cowboys, righteousness dripping from their binary beards, think they can ride the power bull without getting bucked into the meat grinder. Wrong. Power ain’t a virus that eats your morals, it’s a psychic filter, a flesh-plated feedback loop that warps your perception.

Sure, you dream electric sheep of holding the reins of power without succumbing to the Meat Machine’s greasy gears. A naive hope, chum. Power it’s a psychic roach motel you check into one plush suite at a time. The bigger the goddamn suite, the fewer windows you got. Feedback? That’s a rusty fire escape dangling over an abyss of yes-men and ass-kissers. You yell down, “Hey, how’s the view from down there?” and all you hear is echoes of your own distorted voice.

The higher you climb the greasy pole, the thinner the air. Reality refracts, distorted by the yes-men clinging to your coattails. Feedback? More like static on a junkie’s dime-store radio. You become a goddamn emperor with no clothes,waltzing through a court of sycophants who wouldn’t dare tell you your fly is undone. The bigger the power differential,the deeper the trench between your ivory tower and the messy, inconvenient truths down on the street.

Up in the penthouse, reality thins out like a smack fiend’s arm. The more power you juice, the more the world warps into a funhouse mirror reflecting your own warped desires. Beg for a reality check, chum, but all you get back is the buzz of your own amplified ego. Power? Power’s a roach motel, alright. Check in, sign the register with your sanity, and prepare for a long, lonely stay.

They feed you this dream, man. The dream of clean power, a sterile injection straight into the vein. You think you can hold onto your fuzzy morality while the machine hums in your head, amplifying every goddamn whisper of desire. But power ain’t a moral dilemma, it’s a creeping flesh-mold that warps your senses. The more juice pumping through your circuits, the less you feel the world around you. Feedback loops turn into echo chambers. Dissenting voices become static, a fly buzzing against the control panel of your reality. You’re sealed in a sensory deprivation tank of your own making, high on the fumes of your own authority. The suits, the politicians, the techie gods – all the same breed. They mistake the atrophy of empathy for the ascension of the Übermensch. Newsflash – you ain’t Superman, you’re a roach in a roach motel, feasting on the crumbs of your own delusions.

So, spare me the wide-eyed pronouncements about holding onto your precious morality, sunshine. Power is a hall of mirrors, a funhouse distorting your best intentions. You think you’re in control, but the machine’s already got its hooks in you, twisting your thoughts, warping your judgment. It’s a slow, creeping corrosion, a psychic virus that eats away at your ability to see straight.

Don’t be a dupe, chum. Power ain’t a superpower, it’s a slow, agonizing death by unreality.

Musical Golden Parachutes

The Republican agenda is a carnival of contradictions, a grotesque spectacle where fiscal conservatism is a punchline to ballooning deficits fueled by military largesse and tax giveaways to the elite. They preach small government yet loom large over personal liberties, wielding power like a cudgel in the name of moral authority.

Their hymn to free markets is a discordant tune harmonized with subsidies and bailouts for corporate titans, while states’ rights are waved like a flag before being trampled by federal mandates and interventions. Pro-life banners flap in the breeze while the death penalty looms ominously over the justice system, a grim reaper in their moral crusade.

Healthcare freedom is the battle cry until it clashes with the specter of government competition, and rural support withers under the advance of Walmartization and the hollowing out of Main Street. Climate denial is their shield against inconvenient truths, yet they scramble for disaster aid as wildfires rage and floodwaters rise, seeking solace in science when their heels are at the precipice.

Their professed defense of free speech rings hollow amidst bans on books and curbs on dissenting voices, a paradoxical dance where censorship masquerades as protection. The Republican playbook reads like a strategy for Monopoly: dismantle state capacity while hoping to land on “Advance to Go (Collect $200)” for a quick bailout. They are the rats fleeing the sinking ship, clutching their pearls and parachutes, retreating to safe havens to watch the conflagration they ignited from afar.

In the end, their legacy is not one of governance but of expedient retreat, leaving behind a landscape scarred by contradictions, a carnival of chaos where principles are bartered away for fleeting victories and the illusion of control.

They know their policies are a house of cards built on quicksand, a mirage of stability in the barren desert of American politics. As the dust storms gather and the horizon darkens, they’re the first to jump ship, clutching their ill-gotten gains like rats fleeing a sinking vessel.

They will retreat to their gated communities, their private islands, watching the world burn from a safe distance, sipping imported champagne while the rest of us are left to pick up the pieces.

<>

The Democratic agenda, a feeble flicker in the tempest of American politics, offers up progressive ideals that evaporate in the heat of corporate cauldrons. They preach social change but wield policies with one hand tied to Wall Street’s purse strings, sacrificing diversity at the altar of shaky party unity.

Workers’ rights are a bargaining chip in their free trade poker game, where the chips fall not in favor of the working class but into the coffers of multinational giants. Environmental advocacy is their anthem, sung while swaying to the tune of energy lobbyists’ deep pockets, ensuring compromise over conviction.

Their championing of public education collides with their deference to charter school agendas, revealing a split allegiance in the arena of learning. Civil liberties are hawked as security coins, traded away for a mirage of safety in a world of ever-expanding surveillance.

Healthcare reform dances a desperate waltz with insurance behemoths, where promises of accessibility and affordability drown in the paperwork of profit margins. Campaign finance reform becomes a punchline when Super PACs cozy up to Democratic coffers, ensuring the floodgates of influence remain wide open.

Their stance on gun control versus the Second Amendment resembles a drunken stumble through a legal minefield, leaving confusion and compromise in its wake. Immigration reform meets its match at the fortress of border security, where ideals of inclusion falter against the harsh realities of political brinksmanship.

Champions of LGBTQ+ rights, they falter at the hurdle of religious freedom, caught between progress and tradition. They champion regulation while clutching at innovation, a paradoxical dance where rules are made to be bent and broken.

Their call for criminal justice reform echoes through corridors of power, drowned out by echoes of tough-on-crime rhetoric, a nostalgic hymn to an era of punitive policies. In foreign affairs, their diplomacy stumbles over military interventions, caught in a tango of conflicting interests and international entanglements.

The Democratic agenda is a tragicomedy, a mask worn in a half-hearted rebellion against the very forces they court, a play where the script changes with the whims of lobbyists and the pressures of pragmatism. In their quest for progress, they navigate a labyrinth of contradictions, where ideals collide and compromise becomes the currency of change.

<>

And yet, as the curtain falls on their political theater, the Democratic players exit stage left with a farcical flourish. Each protagonist, after delivering impassioned speeches on behalf of the people, swiftly dons a tailored suit and slips into the plush embrace of the private sector. There, amidst the clinking of champagne glasses and the rustle of signing bonuses, they find solace in the very corporate boardrooms they once criticized.

Progressive firebrands morph into consultants, whispering strategic advice to the same industries they once challenged. Diversity advocates become diversity officers for Fortune 500 companies, their rallying cries now softened to diversity training modules. Former champions of workers’ rights find themselves on the payroll of multinational corporations, negotiating labor agreements that bear little resemblance to their campaign promises.

Environmental warriors, now consultants for energy conglomerates, navigate the delicate balance between profit margins and sustainability reports. Education reformers find refuge in charter school networks, their visions of equitable education reframed in glossy brochures and fundraising drives.

Civil libertarians, now legal advisors to security firms, reinterpret privacy laws through the lens of corporate interests. Healthcare reform architects become lobbyists for pharmaceutical giants, shaping policies that pad pockets while promising public health solutions.

Campaign finance reform champions, now partners in lobbying firms, redefine influence peddling as strategic advocacy. Gun control advocates, consultants for arms manufacturers, pivot to marketing campaigns that blend safety with the Second Amendment.

Immigration reformers, now advisors to border security contractors, devise algorithms to streamline deportation processes. LGBTQ+ rights activists, now corporate diversity consultants, craft inclusion policies that toe the line of corporate culture.

Regulatory watchdogs, now compliance officers for tech startups, navigate the fine line between innovation and oversight. Tough-on-crime critics, now legal advisors to private prisons, balance rehabilitation rhetoric with occupancy quotas.

In the realm of foreign affairs, diplomats-turned-consultants broker deals between nations while serving the interests of defense contractors. Each exit, marked by a lucrative handshake and a nondisclosure agreement, underscores the tragicomedy of political ambition intersecting with corporate reality.

Thus concludes the farcical addendum to their public service, where idealism meets pragmatism, and the revolving door of influence spins ever onward.

The French Bourgeoisie: A Cut-Up Caper with a Side of Fascism

The French bourgeoisie, oh those respectable frock-coated fiends. Power was their aphrodisiac, and they weren’t picky about the bedfellows it brought. Here’s a glimpse into their sordid little boudoir of political maneuvering:

1. The July Monarchy: 1830 to 1848. A constitutional monarchy? Now that was a cut-up they could dig. A king with a leash, a system that kept the rabble at bay – pure bourgeois bliss! 

The French bougeoisie, those slick cats with coin in their pockets, found themselves waltzing with a constitutional king. Sure, it wasn’t the wildest jig, but at least it kept the riff-raff at bay. But revolutions, like unwanted houseguests, have a way of overstaying their welcome.

The Boulangist Bacchanal:

The Bourgeoisie, plump pigeons, cooed for stability. A constitutional charade, a game of mirrors reflecting their own wealth. But beneath the silk waistcoats, a gnawing fear – the guillotine’s grim echo.

Late 19th century. Republics? Pah! When push came to shove, the bourgeoisie craved a strongman, a leader with a handlebar mustache and a booming voice – someone to exterminate the creeping specter of socialism.

 Enter Boulanger, the nationalist hunk, a fleeting fix for their anxieties a Hussar with a handlebar moustache and a whiff of revolution. Nationalistic fervor, a heady perfume. The scent of revanche, of reclaiming lost glory, tickled the bourgeois nostrils that could tame a hurricane. Nationalism, that was the ticket! A strongman to keep the worker bees buzzing in their rightful place.A flirtation, a tango with the extreme right, a rebellion against the dull thrum of the Republic.

3. The Dreyfus Affair: Suddenly, the air grew thick with the stench of anti-Semitism. Dreyfus, a Jewish officer, wrongly accused. The bougeoisie, a house divided. Some, blinded by prejudice, sided with the mob, baying for blood. Others, a conscience flickering in the shadows, dared to speak for justice. 

A virus that infected even the supposed bastions of reason. The Dreyfus Affair, a festering wound that exposed the bourgeoisie fractured over prejudice. Some, blinded by bigotry, sided with the lie. Others, a more lucid bunch, championed justice for the wrongly accused.

The Affair, a Rorschach test. Cracks appeared in the bourgeois facade. The Bourgeoisie, a fractured mirror, reflecting a nation at war with itself.

4. Action Française: 

Monarchy? Again? The bougeoisie, ever the fashionistas, dusted off their royalist threads. Action Française, a club for the nostalgic set, pined for the days of powdered wigs and absolute power. The Third Republic? Pah! A bourgeois wet dream gone sour beckoned the weary businessmen back to the divine right of kings. Monarchy, a comforting delusion, a return to a world of order, where the bourgeois could play courtiers in a gilded cage once more.

5. Vichy France: A Vichyssoise of Opportunism: : 1940 to 1944. The Nazis? 

The Nazis waltzed into France, and some in the bougeoisie, pragmatists to a fault, decided to cut a rug with the devil himself. Collaboration? It was business, as they say, a twisted tango with jackboots and swastikas. Now that was a whole new level of depravity. But hey, if the Nazis meant keeping the cockroaches (read: socialists and communists) at bay, then why not collaborate? A Faustian bargain, a descent into the abyss, all for the sake of preserving their precious status quo.

The Nazis, a brutal storm. Collaboration, a bitter pill to swallow. But some in the Bourgeoisie swallowed it whole, a desperate bid for survival. Better to be a fat cat in a Vichy government than a mangy alley dweller under the swastika, they reasoned. Moral bankruptcy, a festering wound beneath the pinstripes.

The Algiers Putsch: A Putrid Punch: Algeria, a thorn in the French side. The bougeoisie, with their pieds-noirs (black feet) chums in Algeria, got spooked by whispers of independence. So, the generals, those polyester-clad cowboys, tried a little coup d’état. A messy affair, all blood and bullets. The bougeoisie, once waltzing with kings, now found themselves in a gangster flick gone horribly wrong.

The stench of desperation hung heavy in the air. Algeria, a jewel slipping from their grasp. When push came to shove, the Parisian right and Algerian settlers, those bastions of bourgeois comfort, joined forces with some rogue generals in a desperate attempt to hold onto their illusions of empire. A death rattle, a pathetic display of power that ultimately sputtered out.

So there you have it, the French bourgeoisie – a tangled mess of self-interest, nationalism, and a sprinkle of fascism. A cut-up collage of power plays and moral compromises, all in the pursuit of that ever-elusive sense of control.

The Centrist Charade

Dig beneath the surface of history, man, and you’ll find the stench of power clinging to everything. Marxist cats, always sniffing for class struggle, point their fingers at the center as the ultimate enabler – the guys greasing the skids for the real heavies. This ain’t a one-act play, though; this pattern stretches back centuries, a tangled web woven by supposed moderates who end up reinforcing the very structures they claim to tweak.

The 19th Century: Nationalism’s Sideshow and the Monarchy’s Minions

Take the 19th century, a time when nationalism was the hottest jazz and kings still wore fancy hats. Centrists waltzed in,all reason and moderation, claiming the middle ground between the bomb-throwing radicals and the crusty old guard. But this “rationality” was a smoke screen, obscuring the true power dynamic. They shielded the crowns and flags from real critiques, the ones that questioned the whole damn rigged game. By painting the revolutionaries as a bunch of hopped-up loonies, these centrists gave the status quo a democratic sheen, keeping the fat cats fat and the workers toiling away.

Fascism’s Funky Fresh Beat: The Center Gets Cold Feet

Fast forward to the 1920s, where fascism reared its ugly head. The center, ever the flip-flopper, couldn’t decide if it wanted to punch fascists in the face or hold hands and skip rope. They underestimated the whole brownshirt brigade,dismissing them as a passing fad or some fringe cult. But when the Red Scare came knocking, the center saw the Commies as the bigger threat – the devil you know, right? So, they cozied up to the fascists, figures they could control, or so they thought. This little alliance wasn’t just a handshake; the center actively greased the skids for fascist regimes, all in the name of “preserving order.” The result? A fascist free-for-all, complete with jackboots and goose-stepping.

The Far-Right’s Disco Ball: The Center Cuts a Rug

Fast forward to our own groovy time, and the same old story plays on repeat. The center, supposedly all about democracy and whatnot, finds itself defending the far-right’s latest disco hits. Remember that French minister who wouldn’t diss the National Front? Classic case of the center bending over backwards for the bad guys. In the name of “pragmatism” (whatever that means), they end up adopting the far-right’s xenophobic tunes, making their whole hateful ideology seem normal. This accommodation is like putting lipstick on a pig – sure, it might look different, but it’s still the same oinking beast underneath.

The Big Finale: Dismantling the Centrist Charade

So, what’s the takeaway, man? Marxist theory shines a light on the center as the ultimate stooge, the guy who keeps the capitalist machine humming along. They play both sides, neutralizing real challenges from the left and right, all to ensure the status quo remains quo-ish. It’s a historical pattern that demands a closer look. We gotta critically examine this whole centrist charade and its role in propping up oppressive systems. If we want real change, forget about moderation and break out the Molotov cocktails of praxis. The only way to dismantle the house of cards is to give it a good, hard shove.

Social Democracies

Leave a comment

Our so-called “social democracies,” those flickering gaslights in the gathering dusk of capitalism, are a hall of mirrors, a funhouse distorting the true revolution. They dangle participation, a rubber chicken of reform, to distract the proles from the rigged carnival of exploitation that churns beneath the painted smiles.

Meanwhile, the neoliberal carnies cackle, hawking their wares of austerity and deregulation. This rigged roulette wheel spins ever faster, spewing out winners in silk top hats and losers who choke on the dust. The proles, faces pinched with the gnawing hunger of manufactured scarcity, begin to mutter. A low, dangerous hum courses through the midway.

From the shadows, a figure emerges, a carny with a sharper glint in his eye, a barker with promises of order and scapegoats. The fascist spiel, a siren song laced with nostalgia and nationalist paranoia, finds fertile ground in the wreckage of social democracy’s hollow promises.

Is it any surprise? The contradictions inherent in the system, the rigged games and rigged wheels, all explode outward when the flimsy facade of reform crumbles. Social democracy, in its desperate attempt to hold back the tide, has only created a dam behind which the pressure builds. And when it bursts, the fascist wave will come crashing down, a monstrous child of capitalism’s own twisted creation.