In the intricate dance of societal structures, the nature of capital and the condition of autism present a compelling contrast, both in their levels of abstraction and their impact on the world. To understand these differences fully, we must delve into the nature of each—capital as a force of systemic abstraction and autism as a condition of cognitive abstraction.
Capital, in its essence, represents the pinnacle of systemic abstraction. It operates not merely as an isolated phenomenon but as a force that permeates and shapes global economic systems. This abstraction is dynamic, fluid, and relentlessly opportunistic. Capital is an entity that evolves in response to the shifting currents of the market, the imperatives of profit, and the transformations of technological advancement. It exists within a vast network of financial institutions, market trends, and geopolitical maneuvers, continuously adapting and reconfiguring itself to maximize accumulation and control.
This systemic nature of capital is a reflection of its inherent drive to expand and dominate. It operates through complex algorithms, speculative ventures, and strategic investments, reflecting a level of abstraction that is far removed from the rigid patterns observed in other phenomena. Capital’s logic is one of endless adaptability and opportunism, thriving on its ability to manipulate and reconfigure the world according to its profit-driven needs. It does not adhere to fixed patterns or routines; instead, it reshapes the world to fit its own imperatives, perpetually seeking new avenues for growth and exploitation.
In stark contrast, autism represents a different kind of abstraction, one rooted in the realm of cognitive processes. Autism is characterized by specific neurodevelopmental patterns and cognitive frameworks that can appear rigid and repetitive. Individuals with autism often engage deeply with particular interests or routines, driven by a unique neurological configuration that shapes their interactions with the world. This cognitive abstraction reflects a set of behaviors and thought processes that are consistent and predictable, providing a sense of order and coherence within the individual’s internal landscape.
The rigidity observed in autism is not a flaw but a defining feature of its cognitive framework. It represents a form of consistency and focus that contrasts sharply with the fluid and opportunistic nature of capital. While autism’s patterns may seem fixed, they are driven by a profound internal logic and a distinct way of processing information. This rigidity is a manifestation of the condition’s cognitive abstraction, reflecting how individuals with autism experience and engage with their environment.
The contrast between the systemic abstraction of capital and the cognitive abstraction of autism highlights a fundamental divergence in their nature and impact. Capital’s abstraction is expansive and transformative, driven by the forces of economic imperatives and global dynamics. It shapes and redefines the world according to its own needs, perpetuating cycles of exploitation and control. In contrast, autism’s abstraction is introspective and focused, reflecting a specific cognitive pattern that provides order and coherence within the individual’s experience.
Capital is not autistic; it thrives on fluidity and opportunistic adaptation, contrasting with the rigid and predictable nature often associated with autism. While those with high testosterone and neurodivergent traits may believe they are pioneering a new “master morality,” their self-perception is mistaken. In reality, the combination of these traits reflects a form of “slave morality”—one rooted in the very qualities they claim to transcend. Their attributes may indeed provide a strategic advantage or unique perspective, but this does not equate to mastery. Instead, it embodies a reconfiguration of traditional values and power structures, where they mistakenly view themselves as the new arbiters of morality, when in fact they are merely navigating and reinterpreting the existing moral landscape.
Expand this into an essay in the style of Marx and Freud:
Capital is not autistic. Autism is rigid and lacks the fluidity of capital which adapts opportunistically as it mutates. The marriage of High testosterone + neurodivergent is the new slave morality. Capital is not autistic. Autism is rigid and lacks the fluidity of capital which adapts opportunistically as it mutates. The marriage of High testosterone + neurodivergent is the new slave morality.
This new slave morality may indeed provide a strategic advantage or unique perspective, but it’s a mistaken self perception which does not equate to mastery but to the reshuffling of cargo cult Tropes mimicking certain successful behaviors without a true grasp of the underlying principles or mechanisms.
As a result, their version of capital remains small and narrow-minded. It is limited in scope and effectiveness because it fails to grasp the deeper, more complex forces driving the larger economic systems. Their approach, based on superficial imitation rather than fundamental insight, ultimately leads to a constrained and less impactful interpretation of capital.