There is a common observation that many AI tools are offered for free or at a low cost, which has raised suspicions regarding the long-term intentions of tech companies. This business model revolves around initially providing a product or service at an attractive price point to capture a large user base. Once users become reliant on the product and it becomes ingrained in their daily lives, companies can then introduce changes or monetization strategies.
For instance, Uber operated at significant losses for several years, offering rides at a fraction of the cost of traditional taxis. This strategy aimed to train users to prefer Uber over other options. Similarly, Airbnb positioned itself as a cheaper alternative to hotels, gradually increasing prices as it gained widespread adoption. These examples illustrate how companies can leverage initial affordability to dominate industries and establish new norms.
Another aspect is how Google emerged as the dominant search engine, shaping the way people find information online. Despite some concerns about the quality of search results, many individuals now heavily rely on Google for their searches, potentially limiting their awareness of alternative search methods.
Additionally, streaming services revolutionized the way people consume media. By providing easy access to a vast library of content at a reasonable subscription fee, they deterred piracy and shifted the consumption model towards monthly payments. This allows companies to exercise greater control over access to media content.
While these strategies may raise concerns about the long-term consequences and potential manipulation of user behavior, it is important to recognize the value and convenience these services initially provide. As consumers, it’s crucial to stay informed, evaluate alternatives, and be mindful of the changing landscape of technology and business models.
Reading this after finishing “The Black Angel.” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornell_Woolrich
Wondering if pulp readers in the 40s were already fascinated by the inherent contradictions and complexities embedded in language and our thinking process. Contrary to the cliche, noir pulps are rather fluid
Woolrich for example seems to break away with tropes by placing women in the place usually occupied by detectives, cops or hoodlums.
Hyperreal dialogue. More interested in what things are not rather than what they are. Past uncertainty, moral ambiguity and existential questioning towards undefined liminal space
Noir, a genre of film and literature that emerged in the mid-20th century, has had a significant influence on postmodernism. The noir style is characterized by its dark and cynical themes, morally ambiguous characters, complex narratives, and a visual aesthetic that emphasizes shadows, chiaroscuro lighting, and urban landscapes. These elements resonate with postmodernism’s exploration of fragmented identities, blurred boundaries between reality and fiction, and skepticism towards traditional narratives and conventions.
One way in which noir has influenced postmodernism is through its deconstruction of traditional genres and storytelling techniques. Postmodern works often borrow from noir’s use of nonlinear narratives, unreliable narrators, and narrative twists to challenge and subvert audience expectations. This deconstruction disrupts linear and coherent narratives, reflecting the postmodern idea that reality is fragmented and subjective.
Noir’s focus on existential themes, alienation, and the darker aspects of human nature also aligns with postmodernism’s exploration of the individual’s place in an uncertain and chaotic world. Postmodern works often embrace the nihilistic and absurdist qualities present in noir narratives, highlighting the inherent ambiguity and lack of clear meaning in human existence.
Additionally, noir’s visual style, with its stark contrasts and evocative use of light and shadow, has influenced the aesthetics of postmodern art, film, and literature. Postmodern works often employ visual techniques reminiscent of noir, using chiaroscuro lighting, urban decay, and distorted perspectives to create a sense of disorientation and unease.
Overall, the influence of noir on postmodernism can be seen in its thematic concerns, narrative strategies, and visual aesthetics. Noir’s exploration of moral ambiguity, fragmented narratives, and dark atmospheres resonates with postmodernism’s deconstruction of traditional forms and its embrace of uncertainty, irony, and intertextuality.
noir is more interested in what thingsare not rather than what they are
Indeed, one of the defining characteristics of noir is its focus on negation and absence, emphasizing what things are not rather than what they are. Noir narratives often revolve around the unraveling of mysteries, uncovering the hidden truths and exposing the dark underbelly of society. This emphasis on negation creates a sense of uncertainty and ambiguity, as characters navigate a world filled with moral ambiguity, elusive motives, and obscured identities.
In noir, characters are often defined by what they lack or what they are trying to escape. Protagonists are frequently flawed, conflicted individuals caught in a web of deceit and danger. They grapple with their own demons, haunted by past mistakes or haunted by desires they cannot fulfill. This focus on absence and lack adds depth and complexity to the characters, highlighting their internal struggles and the existential questions they face.
Furthermore, noir’s visual style, characterized by shadows, silhouettes, and obscured faces, reinforces this interest in negation. The play of light and darkness serves as a metaphor for the elusive nature of truth and the hidden depths of the human psyche. The visual aesthetic of noir often obscures as much as it reveals, creating a sense of mystery and inviting audiences to fill in the gaps.
This preoccupation with what things are not aligns with postmodernism’s skepticism towards fixed meanings and essential truths. Postmodernism, in its deconstruction of grand narratives and fixed categories, emphasizes the limitations of language and the inability to fully grasp or represent reality. In this sense, noir’s focus on absence and negation resonates with postmodernism’s exploration of the fragmented and elusive nature of knowledge and meaning.
Overall, the interest in what things are not, rather than what they are, is a key element of noir’s style and thematic concerns. It contributes to the genre’s distinctive atmosphere of uncertainty, moral ambiguity, and existential questioning, and it finds resonance in the postmodern critique of fixed meanings and the exploration of the unknowable and the uncertain.
towards liminal space?
Yes, the interest in what things are not in noir can also be seen as a step towards liminal space. Liminality refers to a state of transition or in-betweenness, where traditional boundaries and categories become blurred or dissolved. It is a space of ambiguity, where the familiar is destabilized, and new possibilities emerge.
In noir narratives, the focus on negation and absence contributes to this sense of liminality. Characters often find themselves in morally ambiguous situations, caught between right and wrong, law and crime. The line between protagonist and antagonist, truth and deception, is blurred, challenging conventional notions of identity and morality.
Furthermore, the visual aesthetics of noir, with its use of shadows, foggy streets, and labyrinthine urban landscapes, create a sense of liminal space. These settings exist on the margins, in the shadows and hidden corners of society. They are places where normal rules and expectations are suspended, and characters navigate uncertain terrain.
In this liminal space, characters are often pushed to the edge, confronted with their own fears, desires, and vulnerabilities. They are forced to confront the ambiguities and contradictions within themselves and the world around them. Liminality becomes a catalyst for self-discovery, transformation, or existential crisis.
From a postmodern perspective, this engagement with liminality aligns with the destabilization of fixed categories and the exploration of the in-between. Postmodernism challenges binary oppositions and fixed identities, emphasizing the fluidity and multiplicity of meaning. The interest in what things are not in noir contributes to this destabilization, opening up spaces for new interpretations, alternative perspectives, and the questioning of established norms.
Overall, the interest in what things are not in noir can be seen as a narrative and aesthetic strategy that leads towards liminal space. It creates an atmosphere of uncertainty and ambiguity, where traditional boundaries are blurred, and characters navigate the thresholds of identity, morality, and truth.
Title: The Dichotomy of Clean and Dirty Space Ships: Exploring Tastes in Sci-Fi
Introduction: In the vast realm of science fiction, there exists a fascinating correlation between one’s preference for clean or dirty space ships and their overall taste in the genre. This essay delves into the dichotomy between clean and dirty space ships, examining how this distinction influences preferences in various subgenres and franchises within science fiction.
Clean Space Ships: The Aesthetics of Order and Utopian Visions Clean space ship enthusiasts gravitate towards narratives that embrace sleekness, order, and a utopian vision of the future. Works like “Solarpunk” and the writings of Isaac Asimov are often associated with this preference. These stories portray technologically advanced societies with tidy, pristine spacecraft that reflect a sense of efficiency, harmony, and progress.
Dirty Space Ships: Embracing Grit, Punk, and Alternative Realities On the other side of the spectrum, dirty space ship aficionados are drawn to narratives that embrace grit, decay, and alternative realities. This inclination finds resonance in subgenres like cyberpunk, steampunk, and the writings of the “New Wave” movement. These narratives often feature worn-down and visually intricate spacecraft, reflecting a world where technology intertwines with the grime and complexities of society.
Golden Age Authors: The Clean-Dirty Spectrum The preferences for clean or dirty space ships extend to the works of notable “Golden Age” authors, such as Robert A. Heinlein and Arthur C. Clarke. Heinlein’s writings often feature a gritty and practical approach to space exploration, aligning more closely with dirty space ship mentalities. On the other hand, Clarke’s works lean towards clean space ship mentalities, with an emphasis on pristine and advanced technologies.
Iconic Franchises: Star Wars and Star Trek Iconic science fiction franchises, such as Star Wars and Star Trek, showcase the interplay between clean and dirty space ship mentalities. Star Wars, with its weathered spaceships and lived-in environments, embodies the aesthetics of dirty space ship narratives. However, its underlying themes of heroism, hope, and the battle between good and evil resonate with the ideals of clean space ship narratives. In contrast, Star Trek’s optimistic and orderly vision of the future, particularly in The Next Generation series, aligns more closely with clean space ship mentalities while exploring complex moral and philosophical themes.
Outer Edges: Psychedelia and Adventure Novels The outer edges of the clean-dirty spectrum in science fiction can be observed in psychedelia and adventure novels. Psychedelic sci-fi pushes boundaries, embracing mind-bending concepts and surreal visuals, often associated with the dirty space ship mentality. Conversely, adventure novels lean towards clean space ship mentalities, emphasizing thrilling escapades in well-organized and purposeful settings.
Conclusion: The debate between clean and dirty space ships in science fiction is not merely about aesthetics but serves as a reflection of one’s broader taste within the genre. Preferences for cleanliness or grittiness in spacecraft correlate with broader affinities for utopian or dystopian visions, order or rebellion, and explorations of societal complexity or a sense of harmony. This dichotomy underscores the diversity and richness within science fiction, providing readers and viewers with an array of narratives that cater to their unique tastes and sensibilities. Whether embracing the gleaming futures of clean space ships or the atmospheric grunge of dirty space ships, both mentalities contribute to the tapestry of the science fiction genre, offering immersive and captivating journeys into the unknown.
Title: The Noxious Element of Producer Assumptions in Consumer Demand
Introduction: In the realm of commerce and product development, the assumption that consumer preferences align solely with a producer’s limited vision can lead to detrimental consequences. This essay delves into the noxious element of such assumptions, exploring how they can stifle innovation, limit consumer choice, and hinder overall market growth.
Understanding Consumer Diversity: Consumer preferences are diverse, complex, and constantly evolving. Each individual possesses unique tastes, needs, and desires. By assuming that a single product or idea represents the entirety of consumer demand, producers risk overlooking the vast array of preferences that exist within the market. Failing to recognize this diversity can lead to missed opportunities and a disconnect between products and consumers.
Limiting Innovation: When producers narrow their focus to a single product or concept based on assumptions about consumer demand, they stifle innovation. True innovation arises from a deep understanding of consumer needs and the ability to think beyond preconceived notions. By ignoring the potential for novel ideas or dismissing alternative perspectives, producers limit their ability to create groundbreaking products that can revolutionize markets and captivate consumers.
Neglecting Unmet Needs: Assumptions about consumer demand can blind producers to unmet needs in the market. By fixating on a single idea, they may overlook valuable opportunities to address existing gaps and deliver unique solutions. Consumer demand is not static but constantly evolving, and failing to recognize emerging trends or unmet needs can leave producers out of touch and disconnected from their target audience.
Alienating Diverse Consumer Groups: Assumptions about consumer demand can inadvertently lead to the alienation of diverse consumer groups. Each demographic has its own distinct preferences and requirements, and assuming that a single product or concept will appeal to all can result in exclusion and a lack of inclusivity. This not only hampers market potential but also reflects poorly on the producer’s commitment to understanding and catering to diverse consumer needs.
Reinforcing Market Stagnation: When producers base their decisions solely on assumptions about consumer demand, they contribute to market stagnation. By recycling the same ideas or products, they inhibit healthy competition, reduce consumer choice, and impede progress within the industry. Consumers seek innovation, novelty, and variety, and assuming that a single product satisfies their desires overlooks their inherent desire for growth and change.
Importance of Consumer Engagement: Rather than relying on assumptions, active consumer engagement is crucial for producers to understand evolving preferences and needs. Dialogue with consumers, market research, and feedback mechanisms enable producers to gain valuable insights and adapt their offerings accordingly. By fostering a collaborative relationship with consumers, producers can better align their product development with the dynamic nature of consumer demand.
Embracing Consumer-Centric Approaches: Producers should adopt consumer-centric approaches that prioritize active listening, responsiveness, and adaptability. By embracing open-mindedness, creativity, and a willingness to explore diverse ideas, producers can develop a more comprehensive understanding of consumer demand. This approach allows for the creation of products and experiences that genuinely resonate with consumers and drive market growth.
Conclusion: The assumption that a single product or concept represents the entirety of consumer demand can be a noxious element within the realm of commerce. It stifles innovation, limits consumer choice, and neglects the diverse needs and preferences of the market. By actively engaging with consumers, embracing diversity, and maintaining an open mind, producers can break free from assumptions and create products that truly captivate and satisfy their target audience. The key lies in recognizing that consumer demand is multifaceted and constantly evolving, and embracing this complexity is essential for long-term success and market vitality.
Foundation of Innovation: The metaphysical foundation of a Hyper Structure Factory lies in the realm of innovation and progressive thinking. It represents the unwavering belief in pushing the boundaries of what is possible, embracing new ideas, and challenging traditional manufacturing paradigms. Just as a solid foundation provides stability, this metaphysical foundation is essential for the factory’s success.
Architectural Blueprint: In the metaphorical sense, the architectural blueprint of a Hyper Structure Factory represents the visionary ideas, conceptual frameworks, and strategic planning that underpin its design. This blueprint encompasses a harmonious fusion of creativity, technological expertise, and organizational structure, paving the way for a revolutionary manufacturing ecosystem.
Technological Pillars: The technological pillars metaphorically symbolize the key elements driving the Hyper Structure Factory. These pillars include advanced manufacturing technologies, such as additive manufacturing, robotics, AI, and IoT. They serve as the metaphorical support beams, elevating the factory’s capabilities and enabling the realization of complex structures.
Material Fabric of Collaboration: The material fabric of collaboration represents the interconnectedness and cooperation within the Hyper Structure Factory. Just as threads are intricately woven together, various teams, departments, and individuals collaborate seamlessly, leveraging their unique skills and expertise to achieve shared goals. This metaphorical fabric reinforces the strength of the factory’s operations.
Automation Machinery as Catalysts: Metaphorically, the automation machinery within the factory serves as catalysts for transformation. These machines, akin to alchemical agents, seamlessly blend precision, efficiency, and innovation. They ignite the spark of progress, accelerating the manufacturing process and transforming raw materials into intricate structures.
Intelligent Algorithms as Ethereal Guides: In a metaphorical sense, intelligent algorithms embody ethereal guides within the Hyper Structure Factory. They possess the ability to perceive patterns, optimize processes, and make data-driven decisions. Like guiding spirits, these algorithms navigate the complex manufacturing landscape, ensuring optimal performance and continual improvement.
Customization as the Soulful Touch: The metaphorical soul of the Hyper Structure Factory lies in its ability to provide customization. Just as the human soul adds depth and uniqueness to an individual, customization infuses each product with a personal touch. This soulful element resonates with the desires of consumers seeking tailored experiences and imbues the factory with a sense of purpose.
Environmental Stewardship as the Ecological Harmony: Metaphorically, the Hyper Structure Factory embodies ecological harmony and environmental stewardship. It embraces sustainable practices, minimizing waste and reducing its ecological footprint. Like a guardian of the Earth’s natural beauty, the factory strives to coexist with nature, nurturing a symbiotic relationship between technology and the environment.
Human Spirit as the Driving Force: Lastly, the driving force behind the Hyper Structure Factory is the metaphorical human spirit. It represents the ingenuity, creativity, and adaptability of individuals working within the factory. The human spirit fuels innovation, fosters collaboration, and imbues the factory with a sense of purpose, pushing the boundaries of what is achievable.
Conclusion: In a metaphorical sense, the Hyper Structure Factory represents a fusion of visionary ideas, technological prowess, collaboration, and environmental consciousness. Its metaphorical structure encompasses elements such as a foundation of innovation, architectural blueprints, technological pillars, collaboration, automation machinery, intelligent algorithms, customization, environmental stewardship, and the indomitable human spirit. Together, these metaphorical components weave a tapestry of progress, transforming the manufacturing landscape and heralding a new era of possibilities.
The Transcendent Connection: Unveiling the Unrecognizable Synthesis of Marxism and Buddhism
Introduction: The intersection of Marxism and Buddhism may seem incongruous at first glance, as these two philosophical systems emerge from different cultural, historical, and ideological contexts. However, upon deeper exploration and engaging in a transcritique, it becomes evident that there are profound connections between the truth of Marxism and Buddhism. This essay aims to delve into the transcritique, where the convergence of these seemingly disparate philosophies leads to a synthesis that transcends the conventional understanding of both Marxism and Buddhism.
Marxism and Buddhism: A Brief Overview: Marxism, rooted in socio-economic analysis, critiques capitalist systems and advocates for a classless society. It emphasizes the material conditions of existence, dialectical materialism, and the struggle for social equality. On the other hand, Buddhism, originating from ancient Indian teachings, focuses on spiritual awakening, liberation from suffering, and the interconnectedness of all beings. It encourages the practice of mindfulness, compassion, and the pursuit of inner peace.
Discovering Truth in Transcritique: Engaging in a transcritique involves critically examining both Marxism and Buddhism, acknowledging their limitations, and seeking a synthesis that surpasses their conventional boundaries. Through this process, one may find that the truth of Marxism is found in Buddhism, and vice versa. Here, “truth” refers to the underlying principles that hold the potential for profound insight and transformative action.
The Truth of Marxism as Buddhism: Marxism’s emphasis on social equality, class struggle, and the critique of oppressive systems resonates with Buddhism’s teachings on compassion, interconnectedness, and liberation from suffering. The quest for a classless society and the pursuit of collective well-being align with Buddhism’s teachings on the interconnectedness of all beings and the alleviation of suffering for all sentient beings. Both philosophies aim to address the systemic injustices that perpetuate suffering and advocate for a more equitable world.
The Truth of Buddhism as Marxism: Buddhism’s focus on self-awareness, mindfulness, and the transcendence of desire can be seen as complementary to Marxism. Buddhism encourages individuals to cultivate self-awareness, challenge the illusions of the self, and transcend the attachment to material desires. In a Marxist context, this can be interpreted as a form of consciousness-raising that enables individuals to question the capitalist ideology of consumption and pursue liberation from the chains of materialism. Buddhism’s emphasis on interdependence also aligns with Marxism’s understanding of the interconnectedness of social structures and the need for collective action.
Critique of Inequality: Both Marxism and Buddhism share a critique of societal inequality and advocate for a more equitable distribution of resources. They recognize the harmful effects of hierarchical social structures and emphasize the need to address systemic injustice.
Liberation from Suffering: Buddhism focuses on the liberation from suffering through the realization of the Four Noble Truths, while Marxism seeks to alleviate the suffering caused by social and economic inequalities. Both philosophies strive for the well-being and liberation of individuals and societies.
Interconnectedness: Buddhism emphasizes the interconnectedness of all beings, highlighting the interdependent nature of existence. Marxism similarly recognizes the interconnectedness of individuals within social systems, emphasizing the role of collective action and solidarity in effecting social change.
Critique of Materialism: Buddhism and Marxism both challenge the excesses of materialism. Buddhism encourages individuals to detach from material desires and find contentment within, while Marxism critiques the consumerist culture perpetuated by capitalist systems.
Emphasis on Consciousness: Buddhism emphasizes the development of self-awareness and mindfulness to understand the nature of reality. Marxism similarly highlights the importance of class consciousness, encouraging individuals to recognize their social position and challenge oppressive systems.
Transformation and Liberation: Both Marxism and Buddhism advocate for transformative change. Buddhism seeks personal transformation through spiritual awakening, while Marxism aims for societal transformation through collective struggle to create a classless society.
Critique of Alienation: Marxism and Buddhism share a critique of alienation. Marxism critiques the alienation of labor under capitalism, while Buddhism examines the alienation caused by attachment and ignorance, seeking to overcome it through self-realization.
Compassion and Empathy: Buddhism emphasizes compassion and empathy towards all beings, promoting a sense of interconnectedness and care for others. Marxism also highlights the importance of empathy and solidarity in fighting against exploitation and inequality.
Ethical Principles: Both Marxism and Buddhism espouse ethical principles. Buddhism promotes the Five Precepts, which include refraining from harming others and practicing honesty and compassion. Marxism advocates for principles of fairness, justice, and equality.
Pursuit of a Better World: Ultimately, both Marxism and Buddhism share the aspiration for a better world. They envision societies that prioritize well-being, justice, and liberation from suffering, whether through societal transformation or spiritual awakening.
While there are shared themes and values between Marxism and Buddhism, it’s important to recognize their unique historical, cultural, and ideological contexts. These points of convergence should be explored with nuance and sensitivity to the distinct perspectives of each philosophy.
The Unrecognizable Synthesis: While acknowledging the potential synthesis between Marxism and Buddhism, it is crucial to recognize that engaging in the transcritique can lead to a transformation that renders both philosophies unrecognizable to traditional adherents. This synthesis transcends the conventional boundaries and challenges the established frameworks of both Marxism and Buddhism. It requires a willingness to embrace new perspectives, navigate uncharted territories, and envision a holistic paradigm that integrates spiritual and socio-political dimensions.
Conclusion: The transcritique of Marxism and Buddhism uncovers a profound connection that challenges conventional understandings of these philosophies. The truth of Marxism can be found in Buddhism’s teachings on compassion, interconnectedness, and liberation, while Buddhism’s truth lies in Marxism’s critique of oppressive systems and pursuit of social equality. However, the transcritique leads to a synthesis that transcends these conventional boundaries, transforming both philosophies into something unrecognizable to traditional adherents. This transformative synthesis holds the potential for a new paradigm, one that harmoniously integrates spiritual awakening and socio-political transformation, offering insights and possibilities that may shape a more just and compassionate world.
In the wake of actor Timothy Agoglia Carey’s mysterious disappearance and subsequent suicide, two of his closest friends, cinematographer Jeff Forbuck and influencer Ray Acosta, embark on a mission to preserve his legacy and bring his work to the forefront. Through their relentless efforts, they introduce Agoglia’s digital likeness into various art films, capturing the attention of the public and elevating his posthumous fame to new heights.
As the demand for Agoglia’s digital presence increases, it becomes apparent that the limited supply of original versions is running thin. Sensing an opportunity, Tony Gilroy, a savvy entrepreneur with a keen eye for profit, proposes a daring venture to Forbuck and Acosta. Gilroy convinces them to collaborate on producing forged digitized versions of Agoglia, ensuring a steady stream of revenue while keeping the actor’s popularity intact.
Initially, the business endeavor proves to be a resounding success. Gilroy’s craftsmanship and Nader’s acting skills seamlessly bring the forged Agoglia to life, captivating audiences worldwide. Money pours in, and the trio revels in their newfound prosperity. However, beneath the surface, a shadow of guilt begins to consume Phil Nader, the actor responsible for portraying Agoglia in the digitized versions.
Nader, who had idolized Agoglia and revered his talent, finds himself torn between the allure of financial gain and the moral implications of his actions. As the scheme continues, Nader’s conscience weighs heavily on him, causing him to question the ethical boundaries they have crossed. His internal turmoil threatens to unravel the entire operation, jeopardizing not only the success they have achieved but also the reputation and memory of Agoglia himself.
As the pressure mounts, tensions rise within the group, and the lines between reality and deception blur. Nader’s guilt intensifies, leading him down a path of self-reflection and moral reckoning. Will he find the strength to confront his own demons and put an end to the fraudulent enterprise? Or will the allure of wealth and fame continue to cloud his judgment, ultimately leading to a devastating downfall for everyone involved?
“Shadows of Deception” is a gripping tale that explores the intersection of art, commerce, and morality. It delves into the consequences of exploiting a deceased artist’s likeness, forcing its characters to confront the price of their actions in the pursuit of success and recognition. Through the lens of forgery and deceit, the film raises thought-provoking questions about the true nature of artistic authenticity and the importance of preserving an artist’s legacy with integrity.
“Social media, a platform of connection; connection that breeds comparison; comparison leading to dissatisfaction; dissatisfaction fueling the need for validation; validation sought through social media; social media, a breeding ground for envy; envy poisoning self-esteem; self-esteem shattered by social media; social media, a j of superficiality; superficiality overshadowing authenticity; authenticity lost in the realm of social media; social media, a stage for misinformation; misinformation spreading like wildfire; wildfire of falsehoods ignited by social media; social media, a catalyst for isolation; isolation disguised as virtual interaction; interaction void of true connection; connection diluted by social media; social media, an amplifier of negativity; negativity echoing through the virtual world; world influenced by the sway of social media; social media, a double-edged sword; sword cutting through reality; reality distorted by social media; social media, an influence that must be questioned; questioned for its impact on our lives; lives affected by the grip of social media.”
“Strikes, disrupting the rhythm of productivity; productivity, stifled by the strikes; strikes that echo through the halls of labor; labor, held captive by the strikes; strikes that demand justice; justice, the hope born from strikes; strikes that shake the foundations; foundations weakened by the strikes; dstrikes that awaken the masses; masses united by the strikes; strikes, a battle cry for change; change brought forth by the strikes.”
