Month: January 2020

Los’fer Words

Leave a comment

For centuries, humans have relied on language as a tool for communication and survival. The ability to put our thoughts into words has been essential for our development as a species, allowing us to share information, coordinate behavior, and build complex societies. However, recent research suggests that our reliance on language may be outdated, and that we need to move beyond the limitations of words if we are to thrive in an increasingly complex world.

According to some evolutionary theorists, language evolved as an adaptation to help humans navigate their environment more effectively. By communicating with one another, we could share information about potential threats and opportunities, and coordinate our behavior to better survive and thrive. However, as our environments have become more complex and interconnected, the ability to put our thoughts into words may no longer be sufficient to meet our needs.

One of the challenges of language is that it is inherently symbolic. Words are arbitrary signs that represent concepts, but they are not the concepts themselves. This means that our ability to communicate is limited by the words and concepts we have at our disposal. If we want to talk about something that is beyond our current vocabulary, we may struggle to find the right words to convey our meaning.

This limitation of language has led some researchers to explore the potential for post-symbolic communication. Post-symbolic communication refers to forms of communication that do not rely on words or other symbolic representations. Instead, it involves more direct forms of communication, such as gesture, touch, and facial expression.

While post-symbolic communication may seem like a radical departure from our current reliance on language, it is important to note that humans have always used non-verbal communication to some extent. Even in our most basic interactions, we rely on facial expressions and body language to convey meaning. The challenge is to develop new forms of communication that can take us beyond the limitations of words and help us to connect more deeply with one another.

One area where post-symbolic communication is already beginning to gain traction is in the field of virtual reality. In virtual environments, users are able to interact with one another in more embodied and immersive ways, using hand gestures, eye contact, and other non-verbal cues to communicate. This has the potential to revolutionize the way we connect with one another, allowing us to transcend the limitations of language and create deeper, more meaningful connections.

In conclusion, while our ability to put our thoughts into words has been a critical adaptation for our survival as a species, it may be time to move beyond the limitations of language. By exploring new forms of post-symbolic communication, we may be able to connect more deeply with one another and better navigate the complex world in which we live. While this transition will not happen overnight, it is an important step towards a more fully realized human potential.

Retrocausality

Leave a comment

Eric Wargo, a writer and researcher based in Washington, D.C., has put forth an intriguing theory about time that challenges our conventional understanding of cause and effect. According to Wargo’s model of time, the future can influence the present in the past, a notion that may seem counterintuitive at first but which has gained traction among scientists and philosophers in recent years. In this essay, we will explore Wargo’s theory in more detail and examine its implications for our understanding of time and the nature of reality.

Wargo’s model of time, which he has dubbed “retrocausality,” posits that the future can have an effect on events in the past. This is not to say that the future can change what has already happened; rather, it suggests that the future can influence the probabilities of certain events occurring in the present or past. Wargo argues that this model of time is consistent with some of the findings of quantum mechanics, which suggest that particles can be entangled across time and space, and that the act of observation can influence the behavior of particles retroactively.

One of the key implications of retrocausality is that it challenges our traditional understanding of cause and effect. In a linear model of time, cause always precedes effect; events in the past cause events in the present, and events in the present cause events in the future. But if the future can influence the present in the past, then cause and effect become much more fluid and dynamic. In Wargo’s model, events in the present and the past can be influenced by events that have not yet occurred, blurring the line between cause and effect and suggesting that the future may not be as fixed as we once thought.

Wargo’s theory of retrocausality has been met with both skepticism and excitement from scientists and philosophers. Some have pointed out that there is no direct evidence for retrocausality, and that it remains a speculative and untested hypothesis. Others, however, have argued that retrocausality is consistent with some of the strange and counterintuitive phenomena observed in quantum mechanics, and that it offers a promising new way of understanding time and the nature of reality.

One of the most intriguing aspects of Wargo’s theory is its potential implications for our understanding of free will. If the future can influence the present in the past, then it raises the possibility that our choices and actions are not entirely predetermined by the past. Instead, it suggests that our decisions and actions may be influenced by factors that have not yet occurred, opening up new possibilities for agency and autonomy.

In conclusion, Eric Wargo’s model of time, which posits that the future can influence the present in the past, is a thought-provoking and provocative theory that challenges our traditional understanding of time and causality. While it remains a speculative hypothesis that has yet to be fully tested and proven, it offers a promising new way of understanding the nature of reality and the potential for agency and autonomy in human decision-making. As scientists and philosophers continue to explore the mysteries of time and space, Wargo’s theory of retrocausality is sure to remain a fascinating and intriguing topic of discussion.